Read in English

Srila Raghupati Upadhyaya

What Raghupati Taught the Lord

A scholar's private conclusion, a four-question examination on the nature of Krishna, and the embrace that followed.

Adaila, near Prayag (modern Allahabad), c. 1512-1513 CE, continuing directly from the previous pastime page

A close-up devotional image of Sri Shyamasundara (a dark-complexioned form of Krishna), captioned on its source page as 'Shri Shyamasundara, ISKCON Hungary, New Vraja Dham' — used here to illustrate Raghupati Upadhyaya's answer that 'the fo
A close-up devotional image of Sri Shyamasundara (a dark-complexioned form of Krishna), captioned on its source page as 'Shri Shyamasundara, ISKCON Hungary, New Vraja Dham' — used here to illustrate Raghupati Upadhyaya'…gaudiyahistory.iskcondesiretree.com · ISKCON/BBT-affiliated devotional art

Watching Mahaprabhu's ecstatic symptoms - the trembling, the loss of composure, the tears - as he continued reciting his verses, Raghupati Upadhyaya arrived at a private conclusion of his own. Krishnadasa Kaviraja Goswami records it in a single blunt line: "manusya nahe, iho krishna" - He is not a human being. He is Krishna Himself. It is not a conclusion Mahaprabhu ever confirmed or denied to him directly; the text simply notes that Raghupati Upadhyaya made up his own mind, on the strength of what he had personally seen.

Four Questions and Four Answers #

Mahaprabhu then turned examiner. He asked Raghupati Upadhyaya, in quick succession, four questions any Vaishnava theologian of the age would have recognized: which of Krishna's countless forms is supreme, which of His abodes is best, which age of His life is most worth meditating on, and which devotional mood (rasa) surpasses all others. Raghupati Upadhyaya answered each in a single Sanskrit phrase - shyamam eva param rupam, "the form of Shyamasundara is supreme"; puri madhu-puri vara, "Mathura is the best of cities"; vayah kaishorakam dhyeyam, "fresh youth is the age to meditate on"; and adya eva paro rasah, "the original mellow - conjugal love - is the highest rasa." Srila Prabhupada's purport on the first answer reaches back to two verses of Brahma-samhita to explain why Shyamasundara, and not any of Krishna's other forms, was named supreme - among them the well-known description of devotees who see that form "within the heart," their eyes "anointed with the pulp of love" - and to Srimad-Bhagavatam's own declaration that "Krishna is the original Personality of Godhead," the source from which every other form and incarnation expands. Years earlier, in Jagannatha Puri, Mahaprabhu had explored these same four questions at far greater length, across a long night of conversation with Ramananda Raya, a dialogue Krishnadasa Kaviraja Goswami records elsewhere in Sri Chaitanya-charitamrita at much fuller length. Here at Adaila, a scholar he had met only that evening answered the same four questions in four lines, without hesitation.

You Have Taught Me Well #

Mahaprabhu's response is recorded directly: "You have certainly given first-class conclusions." He then recited, Krishnadasa Kaviraja Goswami says, "in a faltering voice," the full four-line verse combining all of Raghupati Upadhyaya's answers into a single Sanskrit couplet - the same verse Rupa Gosvami would later place in the Padyavali as its eighty-second entry. Overcome, Mahaprabhu embraced Raghupati Upadhyaya in ecstatic love. Raghupati Upadhyaya, "overwhelmed by love" in his own turn, began to dance.

A Household and a Village Transformed #

Vallabha Bhattacharya, watching Mahaprabhu and Raghupati Upadhyaya dance together, was struck with wonder. He brought his sons forward and had them fall at Mahaprabhu's feet - though Srila Prabhupada's own purport flags a small chronological puzzle here: Vallabha Bhattacharya's second son, Vitthalesvara, was very likely not yet born at the time of this visit, so the "two sons" named in the verse may in practice mean one son and an infant, or the detail may belong to a slightly later point in the family's history. Prabhupada does not resolve the question; he simply notes it and points the reader elsewhere in the text. Word of Mahaprabhu's presence spread through Adaila regardless. Villagers came simply to see Him, and, Krishnadasa Kaviraja Goswami writes, became Krishna's devotees by that sight alone. Local brahmanas lined up to invite Mahaprabhu into their own homes, and it was Vallabha Bhattacharya himself who turned the invitations aside, keeping his unexpected guest a little longer.

Raghupati Upadhyaya does not appear again by name anywhere else in Sri Chaitanya-charitamrita. What the tradition kept of him is exactly what is told across these two pages: a blessing received, two verses that broke Mahaprabhu's composure, four questions answered without pause, and a dance shared with the Lord he had, by his own reckoning, just recognized.

इस लीला के शास्त्र प्रमाण

prema dekhi' upādhyāyera haila camatkāra
'manuṣya nahe, iṅho — kṛṣṇa' — karila nirdhāra

शब्दार्थ

prema dekhi' — seeing His ecstatic love; upādhyāyera — of Raghupati Upādhyāya; haila camatkāra — there was wonder; manuṣya nahe — not a human being; iṅho kṛṣṇa — He is Lord Kṛṣṇa Himself; karila nirdhāra — made this assessment.

When Raghupati Upadhyaya saw Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu's ecstatic symptoms, he decided that the Lord was not a human being but Krishna Himself.

Madhya 19.100 Sri Chaitanya-charitamrita

Raghupati Upadhyaya's own private conclusion about Mahaprabhu's identity, reached simply from witnessing His ecstatic symptoms.

śyāmam eva paraṁ rūpaṁ
purī madhu-purī varā
vayaḥ kaiśorakaṁ dhyeyam
ādya eva paro rasaḥ

शब्दार्थ

śyāmam — the form of Śyāmasundara; eva param rūpam — is certainly the supreme form; purī madhu-purī varā — the city of Mathura is the best abode; vayaḥ kaiśorakam dhyeyam — the age of fresh youth is to be meditated on; ādyaḥ eva paraḥ rasaḥ — the original mellow, conjugal love, is certainly the supreme rasa.

The form of Shyamasundara is the supreme form, the city of Mathura is the supreme abode, Krishna's fresh youth should always be meditated upon, and the mellow of conjugal love is the supreme mellow.

तात्पर्य से: Purport excerpt: "This verse is found in the Padyavali (82)."

Madhya 19.106 Sri Chaitanya-charitamrita

The combined verse Mahaprabhu Himself recited in a faltering voice, gathering Raghupati Upadhyaya's four one-line answers into a single Sanskrit couplet.

dekhi' vallabha-bhaṭṭa mane camatkāra haila
dui putra āni' prabhura caraṇe pāḍila

शब्दार्थ

dekhi' — seeing; vallabha-bhaṭṭa — Vallabha Bhaṭṭācārya; mane camatkāra haila — was struck with wonder; dui putra āni' — bringing his two sons; prabhura caraṇe pāḍila — made them fall at the Lord's feet.

Vallabha Bhattacharya was struck with wonder to see Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu and Raghupati Upadhyaya dance. He even brought forward his two sons and made them fall down at the Lord's lotus feet.

तात्पर्य से: Purport excerpt: "When Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu visited Prayaga in the year 1434 or 1435 Sakabda Era (A.D. 1512 or 1513), Vithhalesvara was not yet born."

Madhya 19.108 Sri Chaitanya-charitamrita

Fixes the approximate date of the Adaila meeting (1512-1513 CE) and records a chronological puzzle Prabhupada himself flags about Vallabha Bhattacharya's 'two sons.'